Legal Opinion

Corbacho v. Mayor & Council of Newark

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 7, 1997PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The Legislature enacted a tax abatement statute, N.J.S.A. 54:4— 3.139 to -3.149, in order to stimulate the construction of private businesses and homes in areas designated as “Urban Enterprise Zones.” See N.J.S.A. 54:4-3.139(a)-(m). This legislation authorizes the governing body of a city containing an Urban Enterprise Zone to grant tax abatements with respect to new construction. N.J.S.A. 54:4-3.142. Pursuant to this enabling legislation, the City of Newark enacted an ordinance permitting tax abatements for the construction of new one to four family “residential structures.” Newark, N.J.,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nieder v. Royal Indemnity InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  2. General Motors Corp. v. City of LindenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  3. Alid, Inc. v. North Bergen Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
  4. Essex County Board of Taxation v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  5. North Bergen Tp. v. Jersey CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Newark v. Block 322, Lots 38 & 40New Jersey Tax Court · 1997
  2. Township of Pemberton v. BerardiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
  3. Hernandez v. West New YorkNew Jersey Tax Court · 1999
  4. Christian Mission John 316 v. Passaic City (083487) (Tax Court & Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API