Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Latham v. Spencer Circuit Court

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1963No. 30,358PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandis, C. J.

This is an original action for writ of mandate to compel respondent court to relieve one O. H. Roberts, Jr., of his duties as prosecuting attorney in a certain statutory proceeding brought under Burns’ §10-2323 (1956 Repl.),1 and to appoint one Ralph M. Koehne as special prosecuting attorney therein, he to serve without compensation from public funds. We issued the alternative writ.

The cause pending in respondent court below is an action under the foregoing statute to recover gambling .losses of $35,000 lost by Eugene Latham, Jr., in a game known as “dice”. The suit was brought on behalf of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People ex. rel. Hughes v. MayMichigan Supreme Court · 1855
  2. Key v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
  3. State ex rel. Williams v. EllisIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Perfect v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1923
  5. State v. HenningIndiana Supreme Court · 1870

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. Tippecanoe County CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Isaac v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State Ex Rel. Goldsmith v. Superior Court of Hancock CountyIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Carvey v. Indiana National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API