Miller v. Stout
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Bill for subrogation.—The facts and questions presented are fully stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
The complainant is the holder of two-several mortgages against Todd,—the first dated September 12, 1860, being for $3,000; and the second dated April 19, 1870, being also for the sum of $3,000.
The premises mentioned in the first mortgage have been sold by the sheriff for the sum of $3,825, and the premises-*260mentioned in the second mortgage have also been sold by the sheriff for the sum of $2,035. Besides the lien of these two mortgages, there was a judgment in the Superior Court in and for Kent County, in favor of Emanuel J. Stout, against William A. Atkinson and Henry Todd,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Choteau v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1849
- Loughridge v. BowlandMississippi Supreme Court · 1876
- Graves v. GravesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1860
- Barney v. GroverSupreme Court of Vermont · 1856
- Huston's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Stoeckle v. RosenheimCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1913
- Leiter v. CarpenterCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1941
- National Bank of Poteau v. LowreySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- de Paris v. Wilmington Trust Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1918
- Eastern Savings Bank, FSB v. CACH, LLCSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.