Legal Opinion

Fronce v. Nichols

Ohio Circuit Courts

Decided September 15, 1901Published

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Richland county.

1Opinion of the Court

Douglass, C. J.,

Marie-Eronce brought her action in the court below against John H. Nichols, M. D., alleging in her petition a state of facts which makes her action against him one for “mal-practice.”

The petition is in due form containing all the usual averments. To this petition a demurrer was interposed in the court of common pleas and sustained by said court. Error is prosecuted to this court to reverse that judgment in so sustaining said demurrer. This is the sole question.

The petition reads as follows:

“The defendant is a practicing physician and surgeon, in the city of Mansfield; county…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bank of Hartford County v. WatermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1857
  2. Sims v. GayIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Schade v. GehnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  4. Dyer v. WittlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
  5. Marin v. LalleySupreme Court of the United States · 1873

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API