Rose v. Shaw, 00-2489 (2001)

DECISION

The plaintiffs have requested that this Court reconsider1 its April 11, 2001 decision (familiarity with which is assumed) dismissing their complaint on prudential grounds in favor of first giving the Family Court the opportunity to consider this matter. Plaintiffs argue that this Court's earlier decision "does not address the claim for breach of contract between Emily Rose and Jane Rose (Shaw) and the claim of fraud in the execution and breach of that contract" and request that the Court deny the defendant's motion to dismiss as to these counts. Defendants counter by asserting that…