Eberhard v. Brechue
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memo*853randum: Family Court properly determined the amount of arrears owed by respondent to petitioner. Contrary to respondent’s contention, petitioner filed objections to the order of the Hearing Examiner that included an objection to the amount of arrears owed to her. Upon review of petitioner’s objections, the Family Court Judge was empowered to make new findings of fact without holding a hearing (see, Family Ct Act § 439 [e] [ii]; Matter of Boyer v Boyer, 261 AD2d 968; Matter of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Boyer v. BoyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Hughes v. WasikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kellogg v. KelloggAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Eberhard v. BrechueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000