Legal Opinion

Eagle's Nest, Inc. v. Malt

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 18, 1984No. 8328SC1135PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Judge.

The sole issue is whether the trial court erred in granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment. We find that summary judgment was properly granted.

Upon motion a summary judgment will be rendered “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that any party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56(c). The party moving for summary judgment has the burden of establishing the absence of a triable issue of fact. His…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Caldwell v. DeeseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Vassey v. BurchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Ferguson v. . BlanchardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Draughon v. Harnett County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  2. Bryn Athyn Investors, Ltd. v. Hutton/Conam Realty Pension Investors (In Re Bryn Athyn Investors, Ltd.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1987
  3. Draughon v. Harnett County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API