Edwards Stanwood Shoe Co. v. Curtis
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Arenac; Sharpe, J. Assumpsit by the Edwards Stanwood Shoe Company against Alice R. Curtis for goods sold and delivered. Judgmentfor defendant. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.
Plaintiff brings this suit to recover the price of certain rubbers, amounting to $191.16. On January 22, 1908, defendant gave an order to plaintiff’s traveling salesman for the rubbers, to be shipped not before September 1, 1908; the bill to be dated November 1, 1908, 30 days net.
Defendant testified:
“Q. State to the jury, if you please, what your contract was with reference to these rubbers.
“A. He told me when he sold me these rubbers, if they were not satisfactory in every respect, that I could return them at their expense. I received the rubbers some time during the month of September,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Providence Jewelry Co. v. BaileyMichigan Supreme Court · 1909