Legal Opinion
Schultz v. Bear Creek Refining Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 9, 1896No. Appeal, No. 157PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal, No. 157, July T., 1895, by defendant, from order of C. P. Delaware Co., Sept. T., 1894, No. 170, discharging rule to strike off appeal from award of arbitrators. Rule to strike off appeal taken by plaintiff from the award of arbitrators. The court discharged the rule. .'Error assigned was order discharging rule.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
We are not aware of any statute that gives a right of appeal from an order refusing to strike off an appeal from arbitrators. None has been brought to our attention. The order is interlocutory. The cause is still pending and may be brought to trial at the will of either party. For this reason the appeal is dismissed.
2Cited by3 opinions
- Caples v. KlugmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Drum v. UplingerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
- Sheafer v. MelcherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911