Marulanda v. State

The defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentence for trafficking in cocaine; possession with intent to sell, manufacture or deliver cocaine; and carrying a concealed firearm.

It is contended by the defendant on appeal that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a judgment of acquittal, and in admitting hearsay testimony under the co-conspirator exception, and furthermore, *1225that certain remarks of the prosecutor made in the closing argument to the jury were so prejudicial that defendant was denied a fair and impartial trial.

We have carefully considered these contentions…