Legal Opinion

State v. Calhoun

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1975No. State 163PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.

While the appeal is from the judgment holding that this defendant cannot be retried, the challenge is to the exercise of discretion by the trial court in granting defendant’s motion for mistrial and directing that defendant be retried. In reviewing the facts and circumstances surrounding the trial court’s granting of defendant’s motion for mistrial, we deal (1) with the consequences of a less than complete compliance with a demand for disclosure under Wisconsin law, and (2) with the applicability of double jeopardy provisions of the state 1 and federal 2 constitutions, as controlled and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  5. Wade v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Ex Parte LewisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  2. Harrell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
  3. State v. LechnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. JenichWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. SarinskeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API