Legal Opinion
State v. Costanzo
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 26, 2001No. 3D00-2923PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
Affirmed. See Roberts v. Lando, 652 So.2d 1226 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (holding that where counsel did not receive notice of trial date, defendant and his counsel were continually available for trial and *516continuance should not have been charged to defendant for purposes of speedy trial).
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Roberts v. LandoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dixon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005