Legal Opinion

Pierson v. Pierson

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 9, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Advisory Master Herr in the court of chancery.

For affirmance —The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 14.

For reversa l—None.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Crowell v. CrowellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  2. Kershner v. KershnerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  3. Jacobs v. JacobsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  4. Lysick v. LysickNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966