Morrison v. Boggs
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Keysor, J. cited in addition to cases discussed in the opinion: Turner v. Lord, 4 S. W. Rep. [Mo.], 420; Austin v. Richardson, 1 Gratt. [Va.], 310; Farni v. Tesson, 1 Black [U. S.J, 309; Bragg v. Murray, 6 Munf. [Va.], 32; Garrett v. Shove, 9 Atl. Rep. [R. I.], 901; Irwin v: State, 10 Neb., 325.
1Opinion of the Court
Ragan, C.. George H. Boggs and Lew W. Hill, copartners under the name of Boggs & Hill, brought this suit in the district court of Douglas county against Henry P. Horen, Morris Morrison, and John O’Keefe. The suit was based on a bond, undertaking, or writing obligatory executed in pursuance of the provisions of section 1030 of the Code of Civil Procedure and which was in words and figures as follows:
“Know all men by these presents, that Henry P. Horen, as principal, and Morris Morrison and John O’Keefe, as sureties, are held and firmly bound unto the firm of Boggs & Hill in the penal sum of-,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gregory v. CameronNebraska Supreme Court · 1878
- State ex rel. Stange v. CochranNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by3 opinions
- Havemeyer v. PaulNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Chesley v. ReinhardtCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Speidel v. Scotts Bluff CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1933