Legal Opinion

In Re Radzilowsky

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided May 6, 2011No. 19-00809PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CAROL A. DOYLE, Bankruptcy Judge.

The chapter 7 trustee seeks turnover of payments that the debtor, an attorney, received post-petition for work he performed for clients pre-petition. The debt- or claims that this money is exempt under the Illinois Wage Deduction Act. As discussed below, however, this statute does not create an exemption for unpaid wages. It merely places a limit on the amount of unpaid wages that may be paid directly to a creditor through a wage deduction order. The funds received by the debtor post-petition for pre-petition work are non-exempt property of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. White v. StumpSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Lawrence v. Jahn (In Re Lawrence)District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1998
  3. In Re ThumUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 2005
  4. In Re MayerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
  5. Wienco, Inc. v. Scene Three, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Meier v. KatzDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  2. Burciaga v. MogliaDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2019
  3. Burciaga v. MogliaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API