Legal Opinion

Warring v. Keeler

New York County Court, Chemung County

Decided February 15, 1895Published

Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

The plaintiff and respondent on the lath day of August, 1894, applied to L. W. Bailey, a justice of the peace of the town of Veteran in this county, for a summons against the defendant. The justice issued said summons, and made it returnable on the 23d day of August, at ten o’clock in the forenoon. On the back of the summons he put the following indorsement: “El cazar Warring is hereby authorized to serve this precept. L. W. Bailey, Justice.” On the 1st day of August the plaintiff served the summons and made the usual return. The plaintiff was not a constable. The defendant did not appear,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Putnam v. ManNew York Supreme Court · 1829
  2. Fitch v. DevlinNew York Supreme Court · 1853
  3. Wheeler v. LampmanNew York Supreme Court · 1817
  4. Sperry v. . ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  5. Brown v. CadyNew York Supreme Court · 1838

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API