Legal Opinion
In Re the Welfare of B.A.B.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 13, 1998No. C7-97-1140PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
A parent challenges the district court’s determination that her child is in need of protective services (CHIPS) as lacking necessary education under Minn.Stat. § 260.015, subd. 2a(3) (1996). The parent primarily challenges the legal adequacy of a finding of educational neglect when the child’s absences do not meet the statutory definition of habitual truancy. We affirm.
FACTS
Seven-year-old B.A.B. and her siblings live with appellant, their mother. B.A.B. attends a public elementary school. The family service coordinator for B.A.B.’s school filed a CHIPS petition alleging…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Matter of Welfare of ClausenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Matter of Welfare of RosenbloomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Apple Valley Red-E-Mix, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- In Re the Welfare of L.Z.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- In Re Estate of BeechamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: A. L. and J. D. N., Sr., Parents.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: K. F., Parent.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: N. K. and R. F., Parents.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015