Armor v. His Creditors
Supreme Court of Louisiana
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF THE FIRST DISTRICT. The homologation of the tableau filed by the syndics was opposed by certain creditors of the insolvent, because the Bank of the United States, and certain other banks, were placed on the tableau as creditors for the full amount of their debts, alleged to have been due them by the insolvent at the time of his failure, when said institutions had since received from the estates of Morgan, Dorsey & Co. and of William Kenner & Co. (who…
Read the full summary
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF THE FIRST DISTRICT. The homologation of the tableau filed by the syndics was opposed by certain creditors of the insolvent, because the Bank of the United States, and certain other banks, were placed on the tableau as creditors for the full amount of their debts, alleged to have been due them by the insolvent at the time of his failure, when said institutions had since received from the estates of Morgan, Dorsey & Co. and of William Kenner & Co. (who were debtors for the same debts to said institutions, with the insolvent Armor) dividends to a large amount. — that…
1Opinion of the CourtPorter, J.
The tableau of distribution filed by the syndics, in this case, was opposed in the court of the first instance, because certain creditors were placed thereon, for the full amount of the debt due by the insolvent, at the time of his failure, though since that period they have received from the syn-dics of Morgan Dorsey &. Co. and of William Kenner & *377Co., who were also debtors for the same debts, certain . dividends, which greatly diminishes the amount these ere-ditors can now claim from the estate of Armor.
The court of the first instance, after hearing counsel on this opposition, directed it…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Minor v. CardwellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1866
- Burt v. Watson Oil & Gas Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1933