Legal Opinion

Oklahoma Utilities Co. v. City of Hominy

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided March 25, 1933No. 806PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANKLIN E. KENNAMER, District Judge.

The complainant, Oklahoma Utilities Company, is engaged in the business of distributing and selling electric energy to the city of Hominy, state of Oklahoma, under a franchise granted its predecessor in title on March 2, 3914, by the city of Hominy for a term of twenty years from the date thereof. In its bill filed herein it seeks to enjoin and restrain the defendants, city of Hominy, a municipal corporation, and H. L. McFee, M. J. Graham, M. J. Westbrook, O. W. Fields, T. C. Dandruff, R. C. Drummond, II. C. Carpenter, and R. B. Williams, as members of the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Packard v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Glenwood Light & Water Co. v. Mutual Light, Heat & Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. City of Sapulpa v. LandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Brooklyn City Railroad v. WhalenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  5. Zachary v. City of WagonerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Duke Power Co. v. GREENWOOD, COUNTY, SCDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1935
  2. Illinois Power & Light Corp. v. City of Centralia, Ill.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API