Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Frodyma
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 3, 1982PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLiacos, J.
On April 1, 1981, a judge of the Superior Court granted the defendant’s pretrial motion to suppress evidence. The evidence was seized during a search of a pharmacy. A single justice of this court granted leave to the Commonwealth to prosecute an interlocutory appeal and transmitted the matter to the Appeals Court. G. L. c. 278, § 28E. Mass. R. Crim. P. 15 (b) (2), 378 Mass. 882 (1979). We transferred the appeal here on our own motion. We affirm the order of the trial judge.
The facts, taken from the judge’s findings and rulings, are as follows: The defendant was a registered pharmacist and…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Michigan v. TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Maurice AbramsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Commonwealth v. JungMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Commonwealth v. Krisco Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Commonwealth v. LaFranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
- State v. WelchSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
- People v. PaceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.