Legal Opinion

State v. Ennis

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1983No. Crim. 885, and 895 to 898Published

1Opinion of the Court

334 N.W.2d 827 (1983)

STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

Edward ENNIS, Defendant and Appellant.

Crim. Nos. 885, and 895 to 898.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

May 26, 1983.

Kent Reierson, State's Atty., Williston, for plaintiff and appellee; argued by Kent Reierson.

Kurzman, Shapiro, Manahan & Partridge, Minneapolis, Minn., and Bjella, Neff, Rathert, Wahl & Eiken, Williston, for defendant and appellant; argued by Marc G. Kurzman, Minneapolis, Minn., and Richard G. Carver, Bismarck.

ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.

Defendant/Appellant, Edward G. Ennis, was charged with and ultimately adjudged…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API