Thaxter v. City of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM C. CONNER, District Judge.
On February 3, 1989, I denied defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s first cause of action “with leave to renew the motion.” Thaxter v. The City of New York, 704 F.Supp. 531, 535 (1989). Although I was inclined to hold that “coasting voyages,” as used in 46 U.S.C. § 596 (replaced by 46 U.S.C. § 10504), involve the transit of vessels from one port to another, I felt it would be unfair to dismiss plaintiff’s claim for penalties without affording him an opportunity to brief the issue.
Defendant timely renewed its motion. After carefully…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- William T. Gardner v. The Tugboat L. N. Danzler, Her Engines, Tackle, Etc., in Rem, and Norfolk Dredging Company, in PersonamCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960
- Dendrinos v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949
- Carson v. Gulf Oil CorporationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
- Gardner v. The L. N. DanzlerDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1959
- Thaxter v. City of New York (Department of Environmental Protection)District Court, S.D. New York · 1989