Legal Opinion

Southern Furniture Co. v. Mead

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 6, 1933No. 4426PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TALIAFERRO, Judge.

Plaintiff obtained a temporary restraining order from the district court of Caddo par ish, to prevent a salé of certain furniture by tlie mnrslial of tlie city of Shreveport in the suit of B. A. Mead v. Mrs. Francis Hoover, on the docket of the city court of that city. A rule to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not issue was prayed for and granted. Plaintiff asserted a privilege on the seized furniture superior, in its opinion, to that claimed by 'defendant Mead. A motion was filed by Mead to dissolve the restraining order on several grounds, and in this motion…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wagner v. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  2. Lea v. OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1894
  3. Pinckney v. WolfSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1889
  4. Bright v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1886
  5. Williamson v. Ruston Steam Laundry, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Simms v. Lawrence Bros.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Deichman v. SelleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Simms v. Lawrence Bros.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API