Legal Opinion
Cochran v. Planning Bd. of Summit
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 29, 1965PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
87 N.J. Super. 526 (1965)
210 A.2d 99
ROBERT THOMAS COCHRAN AND ALICE K. COCHRAN, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
PLANNING BOARD OF THE CITY OF SUMMIT (JOSEPH C. HAZEN, JR., JOSEPH R. COVIELLO, JOHN FARON, WILLIAM GILSON, EDWARD HOLMES, THERON L. MARSH, JAMES J. KANE, HENRY NEGUS, DAVID E. TRUCKSESS, JOHN WEIGANG) AND CITY OF SUMMIT, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided March 29, 1965.
Mr. Joseph Ginsburg for plaintiffs.
Mr. Peter C. Triolo for defendants.
FELLER, J.S.C.
This is an action in lieu of prerogative writs challenging the adoption…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Bauman v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Kozesnik v. Township of MontgomerySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- STATE, HIGHWAY COMM'R v. GorgaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Town of Windsor v. WhitneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Margolis v. District Court in & for the County of ArapahoeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Hills Development v. Bernards Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- Pop Realty Corp. v. Springfield Board of AdjustmentNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
- Stones v. Plattsmouth, Nebraska, Airport AuthorityNebraska Supreme Court · 1975
- Cervase v. Kawaida Towers, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.