Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Trent

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 1, 2005No. 520A04Published

1Dissent

Justice NEWBY dissenting.

A jury convicted defendant of robbery with a dangerous weapon after being presented with overwhelming evidence of his guilt. Although defendant has not alleged, and the record does not suggest, any prejudicial error by the trial court, this Court grants him a new trial based on a legal antique known as the out-of-term, out-of-session rule. I respectfully dissent.

In August 2001, defendant filed two motions to suppress, one regarding the victim's identification of him, the other his self-incriminating statements to police. The court began hearing the motions on 11…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. State v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Bynum v. . PoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  5. Henry J. Heryey & Co. v. EdmundsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1873

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API