Legal Opinion

A. J. Simler v. Leslie L. Conner

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 15, 1962No. 6339_1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

(on reconsideration).

When we originally considered this declaratory judgment action in which determinations of the validity of an attorney’s contingent fee contract and of the reasonableness of an attorney’s fee in a will-contest case are sought, we held that the plaintiff was entitled to a jury trial on the issues of fact. Simler v. Conner, 10 Cir., 282 F.2d 382. Thereafter the United States Supreme Court vacated our judgment and remanded the case “for reconsideration in the light of Southard v. MacDonald, Okl., 360 P.2d 940.” Conner v. Simler, 367 U.S. 486, 81 S.Ct. 1679, 6 L.Ed.2d 1241. In…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Conner v. SimlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Southard v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  3. A. J. Simler v. Leslie L. ConnerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Simler v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. A. J. Simler v. Leslie L. ConnerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
  3. In Re: Mma Law Firm, PllcSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API