Legal Opinion

In Re Hinds

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided August 4, 1982Published

1Opinion of the Court

90 N.J. 604 (1982)

449 A.2d 483

IN THE MATTER OF LENNOX S. HINDS, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued February 9, 1982.

Decided August 4, 1982.

Morton Stavis argued the cause for respondent Lennox S. Hinds (Morton Stavis, Bernard K. Freamon and Alfred A. Slocum, attorneys; Lewis Myers, Jr., a member of the Mississippi and Illinois Bars, of counsel; Morton Stavis, Bernard K. Freamon and Neil M. Mullin, on the brief).

Colette A. Coolbaugh, Assistant Director, Ethics & Professional Services, argued the cause for complainant District VIII Ethics Committee (Colette A. Coolbaugh,…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Pashman; Concurrence · Clifford; Dissent.

2Cases cited71 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API