Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Great Northern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 23, 1924No. 23,857PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

This is an action to recover damages for negligence which resulted in the death of plaintiff’s intestate. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff and defendant appealed from an order denying its motion for judgment non obstante or for a new trial.

Colby C. Reynolds, the deceased, was employed by defendant as conductor of a freight train running between New Rockford and Casselton in the state of North Dakota. On September 7, 1922, he left New Rockford for Casselton with a train of 32 cars, including 3 supply cars which were placed at the rear of the train immediately in front of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Smith v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  2. Otos v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  3. Perpich v. Leetonia Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  4. Berg v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  5. McKay v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Booth & Flynn v. PriceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  2. Jay v. Walla Walla CollegeWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Maynard v. City of HelenaMontana Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Brown v. RossMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API