Legal Opinion

Bouyssou v. Vayssie

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 27, 1905No. 215PublishedCited by 4 opinions

MOTION to dismiss appeals from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco vacating an order refusing probate of a will and from an order vacating the appointment of an administrator. Frank H. Kerrigan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Philip L. Manson, and Lucius L. Solomons, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, P. J.

A document purporting to be the last will and testament of the above-named deceased, together with a petition for its probate, was filed with the superior court in and for the city and county of San Francisco November 2, 1904, and on November 17th the court made an order denying it probate. Thereafter, December 9th, upon the application of the respondent herein, an order was made by the court vacating this order of November 17th. From this latter order an appeal was taken by the administrator of the estate. The respondent now moves to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that it is a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Estate of CahillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Estate of HartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. In Re SeymourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  3. In Re Estate of BouyssouCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  4. Parent v. LloydCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API