National City Bank of Rome v. Graham
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partHall, Judge
I concur in the rulings and judgment in Division 1, and dissent from the rulings and judgment in Division 2.
I differ with the majority’s construction of the petition in these respects: The allegations which, in the majority view, show that the seller learned that the plaintiff procured the purchaser after a contract of sale was entered into- (Pars. 14, 15, 16) are simply allegations that on a certain date plaintiff learned that The Citizens & Southern National Bank had made a bid and Brittain Bros. Company had accepted it, whereupon plaintiff took certain action, i.e., informed Brittain Bros.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Frazier v. Southern Railway CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Cook v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- Reynolds v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
- Toler v. GoodinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- National Bank v. EvansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.