Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. Weiss
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided August 24, 1938PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
The plaintiff, a duly licensed physician, brings this action against the defendants for the sum of $137, alleged to be the fair and reasonable value of medical treatments rendered to one James Lovand, an injured employee of the defendants. On the trial the treatments and the reasonableness of the charges were not disputed. That the injuries arose out of and in the course of the employment and that such employment was within the scope of the Workmen’s Compensation Law are evidenced by a stipulation signed by the defendants and their employee Lovand, in which an award of compensation by the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miller v. . SchlossNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- In Re the Claims of PetrieNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Szold v. Outlet Embroidery Supply Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Claim of Anthus v. Rail Joint Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
- Feldstein v. Buick Motor Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Holmes v. Garfield Memorial Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Cortland Community Re-Entry Program, Inc. v. Consolidated Claims Services, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2002