Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Pankonin v. County Commissioners

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1899No. 10447PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from the district court of Cass county. Tried below before Ramsey, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Ryan, C.

‘ Certain taxpayers of Cass county sought in the district court of Cass county by mandamus to compel the commissioners of said county to repair the north half of the bridge at Louisville across the Platte river, which forms the boundary line between Cass and Sarpy counties. On issues duly joined it was held by the said district court that the liability of each of said counties had been determined and settled in Dutton v. State, 42 Neb. 804, and the writ was denied. In this we think the trial court held correctly, and shall therefore merely refer to ■the opinion in the case just cited…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dunlieth & Dubuque Bridge Co. v. County of DubuqueSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
  2. Dutton v. State ex rel. PankoninNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Rowe v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1883
  4. In re SpierNew York Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ellis v. SwitzerNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  2. CAPITAL BRIDGE COMPANY v. County of SaundersNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  3. CAPITAL BRIDGE COMPANY v. County of SaundersNebraska Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API