Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Roger's Outdoor Sports, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 7, 1990No. 88-1190PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNEDY, Justice.

In this appeal, Armstrong challenges the constitutionality of Ala.Code 1975, §§ 6-11-23 and -24. Armstrong did not comply with the provisions of § 6-6-227, which requires, as a jurisdictional matter, that a party provide notice to the attorney general of Alabama of a challenge to a statute. Guy v. Southwest Alabama Council on Alcoholism, 475 So.2d 1190 (Ala.Civ.App.1985); Fairhope Single Tax Corp. v. Rezner, 527 So.2d 1232 (Ala.1987); Wallace v. State, 507 So.2d 466 (Ala.1987) (per four Justices, with Torbert, C.J., concurring in the result); Barger v. Barger, 410 So.2d 17…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barger v. BargerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  2. Wallace v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  3. Guy v. Southwest Ala. Council on AlcoholismCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  4. Fairhope Single Tax Corp. v. ReznerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Moore v. Mobile Infirmary Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Henderson by Hartsfield v. Alabama PowerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  3. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  4. Ex Parte GilesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  5. Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API