Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Dukeman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 6, 1989No. 861PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Judge:

This is an appeal from the order dismissing appellant’s Post Conviction Relief Act 1 petition without a hearing. In his PCRA petition, appellant alleged that trial counsel was ineffective in failing to file a motion for dismissal of the charges pursuant to Pennsylvania Rule of Criminal Procedure 1100. Appellant now contends that the lower court erred in denying PCRA relief without a hearing. For the following reasons, we hold that a violation of Rule 1100 is not a cognizable claim for which relief may be granted under the Post Conviction Relief Act, and we affirm the denial…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Commonwealth v. LawsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Gerrold Duane Davis v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Department of Offender RehabilitationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  4. Commonwealth v. BlackwellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GranberrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Commonwealth v. BlackwellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Commonwealth v. TannerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Commonwealth v. WeinderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Commonwealth v. WolfeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API