Commonwealth v. Dukeman
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
POPOVICH, Judge:
This is an appeal from the order dismissing appellant’s Post Conviction Relief Act 1 petition without a hearing. In his PCRA petition, appellant alleged that trial counsel was ineffective in failing to file a motion for dismissal of the charges pursuant to Pennsylvania Rule of Criminal Procedure 1100. Appellant now contends that the lower court erred in denying PCRA relief without a hearing. For the following reasons, we hold that a violation of Rule 1100 is not a cognizable claim for which relief may be granted under the Post Conviction Relief Act, and we affirm the denial…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Commonwealth v. LawsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Gerrold Duane Davis v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Department of Offender RehabilitationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Commonwealth v. BlackwellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
3Cited by19 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GranberrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Commonwealth v. BlackwellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Commonwealth v. TannerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. WeinderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Commonwealth v. WolfeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.