Legal Opinion

Gerhold v. Papathanasion.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1936No. 25598PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeygandt, C. J.

It should be noted first that although Emma Louise Gerhold individually is a party plaintiff in error in this court as she was in the Court of Appeals, nevertheless no claim is made that the trial court was in error in directing a verdict and entering judgment against her as a defendant.

The questions of law here presented are procedural in their nature and relate to the defendant solely in her representative capacity as administratrix de boma non of the estate of her deceased husband. She contends that the plaintiff’s action is barred by reason of his failure to present his claim first to the…

2Cited by21 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Lawrence (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. BuehlerOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Prudential Ins. v. Joyce Building Realty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Varisco v. VariscoOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. State v. Chafin, 06ap-1108 (4-19-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API