Legal Opinion

Garofolo, Curtiss, Lambert & MacLean, Inc. v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 30, 1994No. 255 M.D. 1992Published

1Opinion of the Court

167 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 672 (1994)

648 A.2d 1329

GAROFOLO, CURTISS, LAMBERT & MACLEAN, INC. (formerly Garofolo, Curtiss & Company, Inc.) for itself and for all similarly situated corporations, Petitioners

v.

COMMONWEALTH Of Pennsylvania, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Respondent.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued October 5, 1993.

Decided September 30, 1994.

Reargument Denied October 28, 1994.

Alfred W. Putnam, Jr., for petitioners.

Kevin A. Moury, for respondent.

Before McGINLEY and FRIEDMAN, JJ., and RODGERS, Senior Judge.

RODGERS,[1] Senior Judge.

In July 1992, Garofolo, Curtiss, Lambert & MacLean…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Welch v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. In Re Prudential Lines Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  3. Allentown School District Mercantile Tax CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. AMIDON v. KaneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Gee v. EberleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API