Legal Opinion
Seman v. Illgenfritz
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided February 11, 1929PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBland, J.
This is a suit on a promissory note reading as follows:
“Sedalia, Mo., May 26, 1911,
$7500
“On demand after date I promise to pay to the order of Dorothy Bell Illgenfritz
“THE THIRD NATIONAL BANK of Sedalia, Missouri, Seven thousand five hundred-Dollars, for value received, negotiable and payable without defalcation or discount, with interest from-no interest.
“Mel Illgenfritz.
“No, Due-
The material parts of the petition in this case read as follows: “On May 26, 1911, defendant, for value received, made, executed and delivered to plaintiff defendant’s promissory note, dated May 26, 1911, whereby on…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Egger v. EggerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
- Mathieson v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- Speiser v. SpeiserMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915
- Banner v. BannerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
- Fisher v. CloptonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ivey v. AyersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
- State Ex Rel. McCrory v. Bland.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1946
- Johns v. McNabbSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Smith v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972