Legal Opinion

Seman v. Illgenfritz

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 11, 1929PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, J.

This is a suit on a promissory note reading as follows:

“Sedalia, Mo., May 26, 1911,

$7500

“On demand after date I promise to pay to the order of Dorothy Bell Illgenfritz
“THE THIRD NATIONAL BANK of Sedalia, Missouri, Seven thousand five hundred-Dollars, for value received, negotiable and payable without defalcation or discount, with interest from-no interest.
“Mel Illgenfritz.
“No, Due-

The material parts of the petition in this case read as follows: “On May 26, 1911, defendant, for value received, made, executed and delivered to plaintiff defendant’s promissory note, dated May 26, 1911, whereby on…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Egger v. EggerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  2. Mathieson v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  3. Speiser v. SpeiserMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Banner v. BannerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Fisher v. CloptonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ivey v. AyersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  2. State Ex Rel. McCrory v. Bland.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1946
  3. Johns v. McNabbSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  4. Smith v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API