Legal Opinion

Daitzman v. Rembrandt Realty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 31, 1924Published

1Opinion of the Court

Finch, J.:

The amended supplemental complaint alleges the usual agreement for the sale of real property by the defendant Rembrandt Realty Company to the plaintiffs and further alleges that because of a hen of unpaid taxes against the premises, they were not conveyed on the date of the closing, but that various adjournments were had upon the mutual understanding and agreement that the said defendant would cause the removal of said hen, but that it has failed so to do and finally has refused any further adjournments. Plaintiffs seek a decree that the contract be specifically performed by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Thomas v. . ScuttNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Daly v. PizaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API