Legal Opinion

Joseph v. Angstrom, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 19, 1993PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Order insofar as appealed from unanimously reversed on the law without costs and cross motion granted. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred insofar as it denied the motion of third-party defendant Elkem Metals, Inc. (Elkem) to compel plaintiff to produce statements in her possession of Elkem’s employees. A party may obtain a copy of his own statement and, if that party is a corporation, it is entitled to obtain any statements made by its employees to an opposing party (CPLR 3101 [e]; Kaye v M & J Assocs., 46 AD2d 894; Briggs v Spencerport Rd. Plaza, 19 AD2d 943). (Appeal from Order of Supreme…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kaye v. M & J AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  2. Briggs v. Spencerport Road Plaza, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Le v. PutnamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API