Legal Opinion
United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Grant
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 5, 1990No. 89-2930PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
United Services Automobile Association (USAA) seeks a writ of certiorari to review the order of the trial court which denied its motion to abate. The petition for writ of certiorari is denied as USAA has failed to meet the standard for review enunciated in Combs v. State, 436 So.2d 93 (Fla.1983).
The Grants, plaintiffs below and respondents here, filed their second amended complaint against USAA seeking insurance benefits. Count I sought damages for failure to pay uninsured motorist benefits and Count II alleged intentional infliction of emotional distress. In Count III, the Grants claimed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Combs v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
- Kujawa v. Manhattan Nat. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1989
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. KellyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Colonial Penn Ins. Co. v. MayorDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Royal Ins. Co. v. Zayas Men's Shop, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
3Cited by2 opinions
- Donald E. Blanchard, Jr., and Patricia S. Blanchard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Rubio v. State Farm Fire & CasualtyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995