Baronski v. Shust
Appellate Court of Illinois
Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Charms F. McKinley, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1919.
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely
delivered the opinion of the court.
By this appeal the Schiff & Company State Bank, appellant, seeks the reversal of an order entered in supplementary proceedings, section 64 of the‘Municipal Court Act (J. & A. ft 3381), requiring it to pay $151 to the bailiff of the Municipal Court to be applied in satisfaction of a judgment in favor of Anna Baronski, appellee, against defendants in the original suit, Mike Shust and Antonia Shust.
On February 13, 1919, Anna Baronski obtained a judgment against the two. defendants. She then prayed for a citation to issue against…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Adams v. HackettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- Butler v. JaffrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
- Cronin v. TatgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
- Siegel, Cooper & Co. v. SchueckIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
- Kellogg v. CollerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Elmhurst Auto Parts, Inc. v. Fencl-Tufo Chevrolet, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Trade Bond & Mortgage Co. v. SchwartzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940
- Elmhurst Auto Parts, Inc. v. Fencl-Tufo Chevrolet, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Mueller v. Van DriesscheAppellate Court of Illinois · 1925