Legal Opinion

United States v. Mark Hopkins

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 5, 2013No. 11-2114, 11-2115UnpublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

MARY BECK BRISCOE, Chief Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is, therefore, submitted without oral argument.

Mark Hopkins and Sharon Hopkins, husband and wife, (Defendants when referenced jointly) separately appeal their sentences which were imposed following their convictions for tax evasion and conspiracy to defraud the United States. Both Mark and Sharon Hopkins appeal…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. Gonzalez-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Morris v. SlappySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. United States v. DunniganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  2. United States v. CamickCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  3. United States v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  4. Internal Revenue Service v. MurphyDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2016
  5. United States v. VigilDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API