United States v. Mark Hopkins
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT*
MARY BECK BRISCOE, Chief Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is, therefore, submitted without oral argument.
Mark Hopkins and Sharon Hopkins, husband and wife, (Defendants when referenced jointly) separately appeal their sentences which were imposed following their convictions for tax evasion and conspiracy to defraud the United States. Both Mark and Sharon Hopkins appeal…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Gonzalez-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Morris v. SlappySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. DunniganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
- United States v. CamickCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Internal Revenue Service v. MurphyDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2016
- United States v. VigilDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.