Legal Opinion

Affiliated Hospitals of San Francisco v. Scearce

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 12, 1978No. Nos. 76-3607, 77-1933PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In this consolidated appeal1 this court is asked to interpret Section 213(a)2 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, as amended, which specifies when the Director of the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS) is authorized to appoint a board of inquiry to resolve a collective bargaining dispute between a non-profit hospital and a union representing its employees. The pertinent facts are stated in the district court’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order Granting Injunction reported in 418 F.Supp. 711 (N.D.Cal. 1976). The district court found that the Director’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Affiliated Hospitals of San Francisco v. ScearceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1976
  2. Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Inc. v. James F. Scearce, Individually and as National Director of the Federal Mediation and Conciliation ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Affiliated Hospitals of San Francisco, a Non-Profit Corporation v. James F. Scearce, Individually and as an Officer and Agent of the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, Etc., Affiliated Hospitals of San Francisco, a Non-Profit Corporation, and Associated Hospitals of San Francisco and the East Bay, a Non-Profit Corporation, and Intervention v. James F. Scearce, Individually and as an Officer and Agent of the Federal Mediation and Conciliation ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API