Ford v. Teal
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 18 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL PROM OWEN CIRCUIT COURT. CITED Revised Statutes, section 33, chapter 34, 1 Stanton, 383. Revised Statutes, section 1, article 3, chapter 47. 3 Metcalfe, 353, Pell v. Cole. .3 Metcalfe, 503, Johnson v. Ferguson. 3 Metcalfe, 335, Smith, v. Wilson. 1 Duvall, 35, Allen v. Shortridge. 17 B. Monroe, 555, Burgen v. Forsythe. 14 Metcalfe, 143, Hardt v. Courtney, &e. 14 B. Monroe, 360, Moore v. Moore. 14 B. Monroe, 481, Wright v. Arnold.
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE BOBEBTSOÍT
delivered the opinion oe the court.
To secure a debt of $1,227.35, due by H. C. Ford to ¥m. Teal, Ford’s wife Catharine joined him in the execution of a note for that amount, and of a mortgage of a tract of land to which she holds the legal title. On a petition to foreclose the mortgage and an amended petition praying alternately for a sale of the land on the alleged ground that the note was given for necessaries furnished by Teal to Mrs. Ford and family, her answer relied on her coverture, averred that she had never been privily examined, and denied that the note and mortgage…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Pribble v. HallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1877
- Cox v. GillCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1886
- Tichenor v. YankeyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1890
- Harpending's Executors v. WylieCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1878
- Hughes & Co. v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1874
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.