Legal Opinion

Sharp v. Elliotsville Cumberland Presbyterian Church

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 8, 1966No. 7 Div. 737PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Justice.

Complainants appeal from a decree establishing a disputed boundary line as claimed by respondent in its cross bill.

Appellants have made eight assignments of error. The argument section of appellants’ brief, including certificate of service, covers only five pages. No assignment is referred to in argument by number or substance. In the first paragraph of argument, appellants do refer to appellee’s cross-bill and appellants’ demurrer thereto, and we will take this first paragraph as intended to be an argument in support of assignment 1 which recites:

“1. The court erred in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Company v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  2. Limbaugh v. ComerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  3. Evergreen Heading Co. v. SkipperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  4. Hale v. HaleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  5. Alabama Farm Bureau Mutual Casualty Ins. v. CrestmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. James v. MizellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  2. Employers Insurance Co. of Alabama, Inc. v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  3. McGraw v. McGrawSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  4. Dees v. DeesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  5. Michigan National Bank v. MizellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API