Gantz v. Toles
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Eaton. Foreclosure. Complainant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.
Complainant filed his bill to enforce his rights under two mortgages on property at Eaton Rapids, made by Jehiel and Huldah Toles, and owned by him, and long past due. One of them had been once foreclosed • irregularly, and that foreclosure is now out of the controversy. The bill contains some special aver*727ménts to reach Hannah and Wallace Toles, as setting up'rights derived under an old mortgage and its foreclosure, which are claimed by complainant to have been obtained under circumstances which subjected them to his equities.
When complainant’s mortgages were made there was an older mortgage…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Powhatan Coal & Coke Co. v. RitzWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
- Gage v. SanbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Jackson Investment Corp. v. Pittsfield Products, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1987
- Bacon v. KennedyMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Kenton Insurance v. McClellanMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.