Legal Opinion

Pankhurst v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 9, 1994No. 92-02489PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Judge.

Albert Pankhurst challenges his conviction and sentence for grand theft. We find merit only in two of his contentions regarding his sentence.

At sentencing for the instant offense (case no. 92-2651), Pankhurst was found to have violated his probation in three cases, nos. 90-1357, 90-1362, and 9CM137. He had originally been sentenced in ease no. 90-1357, pursuant to a plea of guilty to five counts of grand theft, to five years’ imprisonment on count I, to be followed by two years’ imprisonment on count II, to be followed by probation as a subsequent felony offender on counts III…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tripp v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. Burrell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dunham v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  2. Felder v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. Mobley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API