Bank of Kentucky v. Brooking
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 13.
1Opinion of the Court
THIS is an action on a bill of exchange against the defendants in error, as indorsers by their partnership name, they being co-partners in trade. Each pleaded severally, nil debet, and one of them pleaded non est factum, in the usual form of that plea, when applied to sealed obligations, by which it is supposed, he intended to deny making the endorsement. On the trial the plaintiffs gave in evidence a bill of exchange, drawn by David Dodge on John Wilkinson, in favor of Silas W. Robins, ^'endorsed, first by him, then by Elijah Crosthwait, and lastly by Robert Brooking & Co. the company name…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Findley v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1823
3Cited by12 opinions
- Mauldin v. Branch Bank at MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1841
- Faler v. JordanMississippi Supreme Court · 1870
- Wheeler v. RiceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1851
- Burgess v. Northern BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1868
- Warren Deposit Bank v. YoungloveCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.