Legal Opinion

Scott S. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 14, 2012No. G046468PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

IKOLA, J.

—Petitioner Scott S. petitions for writ review of an order authorizing Lucille Lyon, public guardian for Orange County, to consent to amputating petitioner’s infected toe. He contends the court erred by relying on a physician’s written declaration to find the amputation was medically necessary.

We agree. The Lanterman-Petris-Short Act (LPS; Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5000 et seq.)1 authorizes conservatorships for gravely disabled persons like petitioner. The conservatee generally retains the right to give or withhold consent to medical treatment. The conservator must seek…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  3. In Re QawiCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. People v. LivaditisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. John L.California Supreme Court · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Esparza v. Super Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2026
  2. Gonzalez v. The Vapor Trail CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API