Legal Opinion · Dissent

Arthur Krause v. James A. Rhodes

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 20, 1978No. 76-1095Published

1DissentWeick, Circuit Judge

Three of the seven active Judges of this Court, namely Circuit Judges Celebrezze, Peck and Weick, voted in favor of an en banc consideration. Only one Judge in addition to the three-Judge panel, voted against en banc consideration.

This is one of the most important cases ever to come before this Court for determination. It surely merited en banc consideration. It involved inter alia the question of the individual liability of the State of Ohio’s Chief Executive Officer, the Governor of the State, for damages resulting from his calling out the Ohio National Guard, at the request of the Mayor of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API